If you've started researching business automation, you've run into these three names within the first ten minutes. All three do a version of the same thing: connect your apps so information moves between them without you copying and pasting. Where they differ is how much they can handle before they start fighting you.

The short answer

Zapier is the easiest to start with and has the most app integrations, but gets expensive fast and struggles with complex logic. Make (formerly Integromat) is more powerful and usually cheaper for the same volume, with a steeper learning curve. n8n is the most flexible — open-source, self-hostable, no per-task pricing — but it expects you to be comfortable with something closer to actual building than clicking.

Zapier

Zapier's whole pitch is speed: pick a trigger, pick an action, done in minutes. It has the largest library of app integrations of the three, which matters if you're connecting mainstream tools. The catch is pricing by "tasks" (each action counts), which adds up quickly once you're running more than a handful of automations, and it handles branching or conditional logic awkwardly compared to the other two.

Make

Make trades some of Zapier's simplicity for real power — a visual canvas where you can see the whole flow, branch logic, handle errors, and process data in ways Zapier can't easily do. It's priced by "operations" rather than tasks, which in practice stretches further for the same budget. The trade-off is a real learning curve; it's not a five-minute setup the way Zapier is.

n8n

n8n is open-source and can be self-hosted, meaning no per-task or per-operation billing at all — you pay for the server it runs on, which for most small businesses is a few dollars a month. It's the most flexible of the three: custom code steps, full control over logic, no artificial limits. The cost is technical: self-hosting means someone needs to set it up and keep it running, which is either a developer skill you have or one you need to hire.

Where all three hit the same wall

Regardless of which one you pick, there's a point every growing business runs into: the workflow needs logic the tool can't cleanly express, or it needs to talk to a system with no existing integration, or it needs to run unattended and reliably without someone checking whether it silently broke last Tuesday. No-code tools are genuinely great until that point — and genuinely frustrating after it.

The actual cost comparison most people skip

A Zapier or Make subscription that handles meaningful volume often runs $50–$300+ a month, every month, indefinitely. A custom-built automation (the kind that replaces what you were trying to force a no-code tool to do) is typically a one-time cost in the same range as 3–6 months of that subscription — and then it's just yours, with no monthly ceiling on how much it can handle.

How to decide

If your automation is simple and linear, start with Zapier — there's no reason to overbuild. If it involves branching logic or you're already paying Zapier more than it's worth, Make is the natural next step. If you're techical and want full control with no subscription ceiling, n8n self-hosted is worth the setup time. And if you've tried to force one of these three into doing something it clearly wasn't built for, that's usually the actual signal that it's time for something custom-built instead of another workaround.